Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (237) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: sofaking6 Big funky green star, 20000 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 32850  
Subject: Re: Whafa's CraigsList Brain Dump for Erik Date: 11/29/2006 3:14 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 5
1. Your prior post did NOT say that the woman would pay for the dinner. Your current post does NOT say that the woman would, should, or ever will pay for the dinner. Deviously, you attack me for drawing a reasonable inference from what was left intentionally vague in your prior post [i.e. who pays for the dinner]. Yet, while attacking me with your current post, you FAIL TO ACTUALLY CLARIFY who pays for the dinner.

Actually, it was someone else's post, so how would Chaconne know who, if anyone, the OP was assuming would pay for dinner?

The woman thinks that, because when she poops, gold coins supposedly come out of her back end, therefore, the decision of whether or not to have sex is totally HER "option."

Not true. I believe that, becase when I poop gold coins come out of my back end, you better stay away from my back end because that's MY MONEY, joker.

Really, are you trying to say that women should not be able to choose when and with whom they have sex? Is that your point here?

Oh, yes--now the victimized male who agrees to go out to this "dinner only" is a "sad sack," is he? Didn't you recently claim that the "nice"/"sensitive" guy is NOT a "doormat"? OK if you want to call that guy a "sad sack" rather than a "doormat", we can do that if you prefer. I think they're essentially expressing the same female attitude towards this guy. [Note: That's YOUR--the woman's--attitude towards the guy, not mine.]

Now you're just freaking out.

By what leap of female, hormone-driven pure illogic did you come to the conclusion that I have a "basic dislike and distrust of women"? I was/am responding to YOUR post(s). Due to my admittedly utter and total lack of "game" [i.e. the lack of the ability/desire/need to agree with silly illogical statements by a woman solely in order to get into her pants], I challenged things that YOU posted.

I'd go with foaming hatred, really. You say that women are dishonest, stupid, illogical, untrustworthy and inconsistent, that they are incapable of providing for themselves ("marriage is a social imperative") and that their bodies are yours for the taking. Is there anything, besides orifices, that you like or respect about women?

It IS true that I dislike women that I find unlikeable, and it IS true that I distrust women who I find to be untrustworthy.

I never claimed that subset was congruent with the set of ALL women, however.


You did, several times.

6





Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (237) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

2013 Feste Award Voting Begins!
Who will win the 2013 Feste Award? Vote now for the Fool that most exemplifies the Fool Community mission of Learning Together!
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Post of the Day:
Berkshire Hathaway

The American Energy Revolution
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement