One of Buffett's recent comments got me thinking : "It's not a great business when you have to have prayer sessions before raising prices a penny... The long-term strength of a business is closely related to its ability to raise prices without much agony... You can learn a lot about the durability of the economics of a business by observing pricing habits."I have to agree with Morningstar's Pat Dorsey, a longtime WEB fan : 'One of Buffett's biggest strengths as a communicator, in my opinion, is his ability to boil a complex issue down into a single pithy insight.'http://news.morningstar.com/doc/article/0,,133760,00.htmlHere's why.Professor Michael Porter's seminal Harvard Business Review article 'How competitive forces shape strategy' showed how the ultimate profit potential of an industry (long term R.O.I.C.) is the collective result of 5 key forces :1. Threat of new entrants2. Bargaining power of customers 3. Bargaining power of suppliers 4. Rivalry among existing firms5. Threat of substitute products or serviceshttp://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=21493041Extending Buffett's 'Pricing power' insight beyond its purely literal meaning provides a neat way to capture some of the essence of Porter's model in one power-packed phrase. However, this is not to say that competitive advantage is merely about pricing power. In some cases, other aspects of competitive advantage (e.g. patent protection, exclusive access, economies of scale) can actually be drivers of pricing power. 1. Threat of new entrants: Predatory pricing power is a double-edged sword that can either cut out new entrants or cut down incumbents. Netscape learned this bitter lesson when it started giving away its browser free to kill Mosaic, which it did, to become the first browser monopoly. Though Netscape charged ISPs for offering their browser to clients, they assumed they could keep Microsoft at bay with their 'free-for-consumers' offer. Unfortunately Microsoft woke up to re-define 'free' by bundling a much improved Internet Explorer into Windows to squish Netscape! Predatory pricing also helped Toyota dismantle US automakers' dominance by offering cheaper – and eventually better – Japanese models. 2. Bargaining power of customers: Coke's been able to raise prices with impunity because it has captive bottlers - an example of weak customer bargaining power leading to high supplier profitability. The immensely profitable US pharma industry is an example of pricing power where the patient has little or no say in how much he pays for a drug. Buffett's comment also applies to power brands like Marlboro or Budweiser which have confidently taken price increases exploiting consumers' addiction or brand loyalty. Conversely, extensive choice of retailers and retailing formats makes it very difficult for most of them to exercise significant pricing power - very often all the shopper has to do is walk out one store and walk into an adjacent store to buy what she wants at her chosen price.3. Bargaining power of suppliers: Wal Mart and Dell are probably the two best known 'category killers' who squeeze suppliers' profitability through relentless price bargaining. OTOH, OPEC is an example of cartel pricing power resulting in the entire oil industry being awash in money extracted from consumers' wallets. 4. Rivalry among existing firms:Airlines are notorious for having cumulatively lost bucketloads of cash since inception due to constant fare wars well before budget carriers came in and made matters worse. Telecom overcapacity since the great buildout has similarly damaged the industry's ability to even hold prices. Financial services, meanwhile continue to be immensely profitable because the non-standardization of their service offerings allows them to charge as much as they can get away with. 5. Threat of substitute products or services:Cheap generics are the single biggest threat to pure pharms' pricing power because they give customers (patients and pharmacists) the power to choose to pay less. Store brands do the same to Consumer product companies selling branded toiletries. Conversely, until mobile phones came along, fixed line phone companies could price to the hilt because they had very little fear of substitution. Buffett gave a newspaper substitution threat example quoted by Dardashti : “In the 1970s and 1980s, newspaper publishers raised rates on an annual basis, and didn't worry that people would drop their subscriptions or that advertisers would stop advertising. Now, publishers agonize about losing advertising and if a 20 cent increase will cause readers to just drop their subscriptions. [Shai Dardashti comment: The single change in newspaper business economics is clearly the widespread availability of free news coverage over the Internet.]”http://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=22431748Hopefully the above examples will help you apply Buffett's neat 'pricing power' concept to analyze the competitive advantage – or 'moat' – of a firm. Once again, do keep in mind that there are many other aspects to building a deep, wide moat full of hungry reptiles to discourage potential threats. Perhaps you'd like to share some examples of your from Porter's categories for discussion?
I found your analysis very interesting, Cogitarius, but I noted one glaring omission.The absolute King of "Pricing Power" technique is of course Buffett himself made possible by Berkshire's bottomless pit of money. I believe I saw Him quoted once as saying He didn't care if an investment makes money over the first few years. Of course not. It is a deliberate strategy while He increases market share. Have you purchased camera film, razor blades, batteries or soft drinks lately? After most competitors have been driven out of the market by lowball pricing ( leaving perhaps only slightly more than duopoly industry structures ), all of these consumer goods are now priced at rip-off prices. When do you ever see any of them at really "sale prices". You don't.I am surprised He didn't go after BUD much sooner. I expect that a stake in a large liqour/wine market leader next. Then over the next 3 to 5 years you can watch the strategy in action.M2CWWayne
Wayne : The absolute King of "Pricing Power" technique is of course BuffettThanks for that interesting example. In money management, Buffett probably has one of the widest moats around due to his unique 'Wait, Buy, Hold' approach to buying something he's interested in. (25 years for BUD!!)However, in the context of Porter's model, his 'pricing power' is more passive than active. From what I've read, he waits for the price to be right, rather than negotiates the price down to his desired level. In fact, according to this post by FocusFocus, in buying businesses he avoids companies not available for sale or not ready to name a price: http://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=22432174So yes, Buffett has immense pricing power, but doesn't actively exercise it to influence the dynamics of a particular industry or company.
So yes, Buffett has immense pricing power, but doesn't actively exercise it to influence the dynamics of a particular industry or company.I would say he has NO pricing power. He has less than I do as an individual investor. I can buy stock in microcaps all day long. I can pick up stocks that are thinly traded and are at rock bottom prices. I can walk away from a transaction where I practicaly stole the shares (they are sometimes that cheap) and no one will ever take notice. Buffett said (so I have heard) that he could easily bring in 30% returns IF he were only managing a few million dollars. Buffett has done well inspite of , not beause of, his vast amount of capitol to invest.
Cogitarius:So yes, Buffett has immense pricing power, but doesn't actively exercise it to influence the dynamics of a particular industry or company.Are you saying Buffett is not very smart? Or that he doesn't care about maximizing profit for his shareholders in the long run? When I 'take a read' on the man, neither of those assessments is possible. I think he does play a part in managements' plans to use 'pricing power' as effectively as possible. It seems to me that to do otherwise would be a failure of his fiduciary duty and we know how he feels about that. ( Of course, discussions with management and other board members about "strategy" are obviously, and must be, very private conversations - I wouldn't expect to read about them ).I also wouldn't expect him to discuss those things in public except in the generalizations that were quoted. Mr. Buffett, despite his obvious talents, still puts his pants on one leg at a time like the rest of us and is subject to the same human emotions.I cannot prove my assessment is correct. It is an hypothesis.Psychoinvest:I agree with your comments but I think we are discussing different things. I was writing about "pricing power" for the products of a company after he takes a stake in it; not how he goes about obtaining part of the company. Wayne
Wayne : Are you saying Buffett is not very smart? That wouldn't be very smart of me, now would it?Looks like both psycho and I interpreted your post in the context of his purchases of companies and their stockI think he does play a part in managements' plans to use 'pricing power' as effectively as possible. It seems to me that to do otherwise would be a failure of his fiduciary duty and we know how he feels about that.From what little I know of him, he doesn't seem to be that hands-on in operational issues like pricing. But he obviously likes companies with pricing power - witness the quote which started this thread.