No. of Recommendations: 0 is a link that discusses this issue in terms of the risk premium over bonds being zero or even negative (which I believe would have to be taken as being the same as over-valued). I believe that they are talking about the US market as a whole, rather than just the S/P500. However the difference between the two is not large.

I don't know if they are correct or not, but I do view the extremely low dividends pay-outs as bringing additional risk to the equation. When payouts were more normally in the 3-4% range, if a stock's finanical condition remained unchanged (continued dividend payments) then this dividend yield has a moderating effect on just 'how low can it go'. That moderating effect is gone, IMHO.

OTOH, I am seeing more and more of these doomsday reports. Historically the market has made its biggest gains about the time that 'everyone' began to feel that it had no future. I tend to be a pessimist on this one, however and am keeping my equity allocation under 50%.

Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.