Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (29) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: LorenCobb Big gold star, 5000 posts Top Favorite Fools Top Recommended Fools Feste Award Nominee! Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 445590  
Subject: Re: We treat the mentally ill with jail Date: 12/17/2012 11:48 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 5
1pg: She mentions state-run treatment centers, but weren't those really just prisons under another name? Most of the "patients" were not free to leave... How do we handle this? It is very difficult to get someone committed (as it should be!) unless they agree to it. Most of the truly ill aren't going to agree to it, so a court action is required. Being committed against your will is, in essence, prison.

All good points, good questions.

I hate the idea of warehousing the mentally ill, but fortunately there are plenty of alternatives.

First. In between families and police -- which you mentioned -- there are at least two alternatives: home visits by a psychiatric social worker, and halfway houses. We don't need to force the mentally ill into asylums as in the old days. We (all of society) merely need to make sure they take their meds, or get their therapy, or whatever it is that they need to remain non-destructive of themselves and others.

Second. Almost all "normal" people are able to detach themselves from total emotional immersion in entertainment, whether it is violent movies, pornography, graphic novels, animé cartoons, or whatever. The problem lies with the small proportion of people who are not able to detach. They may seem normal in the workplace and in social interactions, but put them in a situation in which they are drawn into "entertainment" that triggers deep volcanic emotions, and there is trouble. Unresolved physical and sexual trauma is usually the cause, but there are other factors as well. I think we need to start curbing over-the-top violence in our entertainment, to protect ourselves from those who are drawn in to such an extent that they lose track of the boundary between "reality" and "art".

We don't yet know the facts about Adam Lanza, and I hate to guess what went on in his home or in his mind. However, I don't think we need Adam Lanza to make a public health case against blood-and-sex drenched entertainment. The evidence is already quite strong, and would be stronger had not Congress stripped the CDC of funding for the study of violence as a public health issue.

Loren
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (29) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

Foolanthropy 2014!
By working with young, first-time moms, Nurse-Family Partnership is able to truly change lives – for generations to come.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Post of the Day:
Macro Economics

Economic Implications of Cuba
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement