No. of Recommendations: 0
I have a variable income, so I don't know whether I will be eligible to add to my Roth IRA in 2000, but don't want to wait until year-end to get my $2000 into the market. Should I (1) open a traditional IRA (non-deductible for me anyway), then convert it later into my Roth if it turns out that I can (and if I do, can I take the earnings on the $2000 into the Roth also, and do I have to pay taxes on them even though they would have accumulated tax-free in either form of IRA?), or (2) put the $2000 into my Roth, then convert that contribution to a new traditional IRA at year-end if it turns out that I am not eligible for the Roth (and ditto the tax question on earnings accumulated)? I have been researching the pros and cons of each, but ultimately am just stumped. Why do the Roth IRA rules have to be so confusing? (rhetorical question) Thanks in advance for any guidance any of you can offer!
Print the post  


The Retire Early Home Page
Discussion on accelerating retirement day.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.