Show Latest Posts:

The 10 Most Recent Messages By mungofitch

Take me back to where I was.
  • Date: 8/24/16 4:54 PM
  • Number: 263493
  • Recommendations: 2
There are no VL fields at all available any more in GTR1 (or at backtest.org), alas.

Various rough substitutes for timeliness have been suggested over the years, or you can build your own.
Obviously it
(Continued...)
  • Date: 8/24/16 2:13 PM
  • Number: 225363
  • Recommendations: 0
I think the real money is usually in companies run for a profit by competent people on a slightly level playing field.
...
Not that it's relevant, but I'm curious as to whether you think TWX would qualify, or am I overly

(Continued...)
  • Date: 8/24/16 2:02 PM
  • Number: 225362
  • Recommendations: 0
I use IG and I thought they were very broad, obviously not! Who do you use?

I use Interactive Brokers for most of my trades.
I also have an accounts at a couple of Swiss-based banks, and they have
generally been able to get
(Continued...)
  • Date: 8/24/16 1:58 PM
  • Number: 225361
  • Recommendations: 5
Google turned up this:
(Continued...)
  • Date: 8/24/16 10:18 AM
  • Number: 225354
  • Recommendations: 8
For if you think of iPhone as a "phone", you really have no idea whatsoever, I imagine, of why T & T have bough AAPL stock.
And if you think that Apple is exclusively about the iPhone, that gets you even further from the

(Continued...)
  • Date: 8/24/16 9:41 AM
  • Number: 225353
  • Recommendations: 2
Why do you screen out telecoms?

Oh, just a whim.
A lot of telcos internationally are scary government run value traps.
They're losing fixed line business, they suffer from irrational regulated rates.
Used either as
(Continued...)
  • Date: 8/23/16 9:42 PM
  • Number: 225349
  • Recommendations: 16
Jumbo shrimp.
Military intelligence.
Affordable luxury.
Taped live.
Sport utility vehicle.
Financial journalism.

Jim

"That's one of
(Continued...)
  • Date: 8/23/16 8:18 PM
  • Number: 225347
  • Recommendations: 16
I would certainly be happy with a 7.7% real return return for the next 10 years. Wonder what the odds are?

Very good, I'd guess.
If we miss that, my hunch is that it wouldn't be by that much, maybe a
(Continued...)
  • Date: 8/23/16 8:03 PM
  • Number: 225346
  • Recommendations: 5
Thanks much!

No problemo.
Looks like lots more interesting picks if you drop the market cap requirement to $100m from $500m, which makes sense.

Not quite random selection
(Continued...)
  • Date: 8/23/16 5:42 PM
  • Number: 225343
  • Recommendations: 4
Would you mind posting the list of 46 companies in the FT screener result?

Sure.
Slightly different run so there are only 39 here.
I deleted some of the columns, like beta and analyst consensus. Keep away from the dark side
(Continued...)
Show Latest Posts:
Total = 10

Take me back to where I was.
Stock Folders: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z