The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page

Investing/Strategies / Retirement Investing


Subject:  Re: Roth conversion questions Date:  4/14/1998  6:16 PM
Author:  SnootFool Number:  2827 of 88060


You wrote- <I'm trying to figure out the logic behind making someone pay taxes on the converted amount that is income to the traditional IRA (as opposed to the
contributions made to it). Since income grows tax free in both a traditional IRA and a Roth IRA, why should one have to pay tax on this income during a conversion? This sounds like a penalty to me.>

Technically, income grows tax-*free* only in a Roth, Traditional IRAs grow tax-*deferred* until distributed. Unfortunately for all of us, the IRS considers a Roth conversion an authorized distribution, which of course, is a taxable event. (Whether you consider taxes a penalty is a philosophical issue, at the IRS a *penalty* would be 10% additional clams-Ouch)
Just think of the taxes as the soaking you get running from a good shelter (the traditional IRA) to a Great one (the Roth). You (& most folks), living in the 15% bracket now, will more than make up the loss in the LONG RUN (20-30+ years), assuming you pay the taxes from $$ outside your IRA (this last bit is *critical* too).
Remember, your goal is to Foolishly invest your way into a higher bracket by retirement time! You are 'locking in' your current 15% bracket on every Roth contribution. Neat trick.
Chris S.
Copyright 1996-2018 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us