The Motley Fool Discussion Boards
Investing/Strategies / Retirement Investing
|Subject: Re: Investing after retirement||Date: 7/13/1999 3:15 PM|
|Author: intercst||Number: 12075 of 77328|
Finally, intercst presents a third option. Never buy a house at all -- simply rent and invest the difference. That option works well in a rent-controlled environment, where you can enjoy confidence that rent increases will be limited. Nevertheless, as others (I believe including JAFO31) have pointed out, rent will increase, but the mortgage will not. Thus, there is a risk that in time, there will be no difference to invest; in other words, that today's rent will be more expensive than, say, the payment on a 20-year-old mortgage.
Surprisingly, "rent controlled" towns like San Francisco and New York City have very high apartment rents while cities where the free market reigns like Houston and Phoenix have modest rental rates. I suspect that the abundance of buildable land and abscence of any real zoning laws are responsible for the "overbuilding" of apartments in Houston and the resulting low rental rates.
In the case of San Francisco and Manhattan (New York City), the fact that there are few places to build new housing stock keeps rents high.
|Copyright 1996-2015 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us|