The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page

Retirement Discussions / Retire Early CampFIRE

URL:  http://boards.fool.com/ltduggg-writes-an-excellent-discussion-of-14649060.aspx

Subject:  Re: OT: Fuel Cells for remote site Date:  3/28/2001  2:58 PM
Author:  metallurge Number:  34874 of 744957

<duggg writes an excellent discussion of on-site power generation versus grid losses, including this line:>

How is its pollution disposed of?

... to which I (metallurge) respond,

With most of the currently feasible fuels being converted on-site into the hydrogen needed to feed the fuel cell, there are essentially four things the fuel cell process produces:

1) electricity
2) heat
3) nearly pure water
4) CO2

Now, the CO2 produced is substantially less (like 1/4 to 1/2, depending on whether you can use that heat or not) than would have been produced through traditional electrical generation methods.

Other pollutants like CO, NOx, NO, SOx are in the <1 ppm range from the data I've seen.

FWIW, the number I've seen for electrical transmission line losses in the US is 3-7%.
Copyright 1996-2014 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us