The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page

Religion & Culture / Christian Fools

URL:  http://boards.fool.com/rev-if-theres-reason-to-believe-that-a-child-21926696.aspx

Subject:  Re: Reforming marriage Date:  1/18/2005  1:45 PM
Author:  feedmeNOWhuman Number:  117772 of 195761

rev: If there's reason to believe that a child might be in danger, as is the case when the biological parents prove their lack of judgement self-control by conceiving a child out of wedlock

So you believe that, since Nancy was already two months pregnant when she married Ronald Reagan, that when Patti was born, the government should have declared them unfit to raise a child and stepped in and confiscated her?

That's just about the dumbest post I've ever read.








Copyright 1996-2014 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us