The Motley Fool Discussion Boards
Politics & Current Events / Foolish Politics
|Subject: Re: Poll: Worst Presidentevised||Date: 4/26/2006 8:31 AM|
|Author: dectra||Number: 155 of 162|
You can NOT make a rational statement that Butter cost more than Guns. It is fiscally impossible.
Two war items alone prove my point: At $45 million per aircraft for the JSF, and the cost of $144.4 BILLIION (to date) for the Iraq debacle.
Butter produced in the US: 145 million pounds, at the national avrage of 1.33= 1,928,500,000 (or 2 Billion).
So, unless the US Government has bought ALL Known supplies of Butter for the next 15 years, WE DO NOT SPEND MORE ON BUTTER THAN GUNS.
Bush is a Disaster.
If he's the best we've got, continue to call me a FORMER Republican.
|Copyright 1996-2015 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us|