The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page

Investing/Strategies / Boring Stocks


Subject:  Re: Boring Stocks 3.0 FAQ Ver. 1.0 Date:  4/1/2007  10:48 PM
Author:  TheStamper Number:  5639 of 5674

Hi Dean !

When considering the usage of "seeks" vs "seekers", I found far more interesting visions arising from "seeks".

I had to go back and re-read the post. I didn't know what the heck you were going-on about! LOL. I assure you that was simply a typo (I make a lot of those), and, as a result, completely unintentional.

Thanks for taking the time to read & respond to the FAQ. I'm sorry I've let the board fall in to disrepair again, as I have added 2 children & greater responsibility in the office and & at home. I just haven't time to do my research, and then properly discuss it with others. I wish I did. I though we were on to something.


Copyright 1996-2018 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us