The Motley Fool Discussion Boards
Investing/Strategies / Retirement Investing
|Subject: Re: Clinton Retirement Plan||Date: 10/12/2007 7:46 AM|
|Author: hockeypop||Number: 59627 of 78012|
"Age 65 retirement in the 1940's was near death for most males."
Not really. You need to review life expectancy at age 65 and not average life expectancy from birth.
Good data that proves both our points. About 10% more males and females were dead in the 40's by 65 than now.
If there is good fiduciary news its that illegal aliens are infusing it with billions of dollars of payments off of false SS #s.
|Copyright 1996-2015 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us|