The Motley Fool Discussion Boards
Financial Planning / Tax Strategies
|Subject: Re: Tax filing questions - decedant||Date: 3/26/2008 8:45 PM|
|Author: KLTolly||Number: 99782 of 121180|
Thank you for the kind words; I'm having a difficult time, but it's somewhat easier to accept that others have had this terrible experience.
Yes, I am using MFJ status for 2007. The 2007 return (in print) appears correct. It had previously insisted that I key an amount for Dad's RMD in 2007. Once I corrected the personal data to reflect that Mom passed after 12/31/2007 but before the filing of this return, that prompt went away. Turbotax still reflects efile as an option, although I wanted to be sure that I have the RMD issue under control to avoid having to process an amendment.
The Bank has tried to be helpful to the best of their abilities; they have told me that Mom elected to treat the IRA as her own. Her RMD for 2007 was based on her age and account balance as of 12/31/2006; the same information appeared for Dad. I had interpreted the following:
Surviving spouse. If you are a surviving spouse who is the sole beneficiary of your deceased spouse's IRA, you may elect to be treated as the owner and not as the beneficiary. If you elect to be treated as the owner, you determine the required minimum distribution (if any) as if you were the owner beginning with the year you elect or are deemed to be the owner. However, if you become the owner in the year your deceased spouse died, you are not required to determine the required minimum distribution for that year using your life; rather, you can take the deceased owner's required minimum distribution for that year (to the extent it was not already distributed to the owner before his or her death).
This seems to imply to me that there should have been a distribution in addition to that calculated 12/31/2006 for my mother. Or am I possibly overanalyzing this?
Thank you again!
|Copyright 1996-2014 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us|