The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page

Religion & Culture / Creation vs. Evolution

URL:  http://boards.fool.com/you-said-here-are-the-facts-of-the-case-that-you-26619979.aspx

Subject:  Re: Expelled Date:  5/4/2008  8:14 PM
Author:  pauls59 Number:  14530 of 26618

You said:

Here are the facts of the case that you have not provided any rebuttal for.

And I gave you a link for the evidence that clearly shows rebuttal to most items regarding Sternberg. It is, on its face, compelling and if you cannot see what happened when reviewing the evidence, well, I cannot do any more to help you or anyone else make a proper conclusion. It is the best evidence of discrimination. Carry on and be oblivious to it if you like.

What if the shoe was on the other foot. What if the ID had complete controll of science and disallowed any serious consideration of evolution. For your part, you would be the one disenfranchised (sp). You would be certain that science is suffering and freedom of inquiry was lost. We have the same evidence. The same old bones, but Behe would be the king of science and evolution would be mocked, be pseudo science, all because the hitler of science is an Intelligent Design scientist. You now have to attend the church of intelligent design in the science classroom.

The opposite is what Intelligent design supporters find in the atheist church of evolution without any room for thoughtful Scientific debate.

I will make one final comment with the thing that started the fury on this. Goofyhoofy made a notion that the Expelled movie was flawed because of this interview:

http://www.newsweek.com/id/130619

The interview was not from the movie yet it was attributed to the movie, Goofyhoofie's post in itself was misleading. Besides that, Newsweek may have abbreviated or otherwise erred in the translation of the interview, and what Stein said may not have been properly transcribed onto the newsweek site. Newsweek has the usual disclaimer (see paragraph 8):

http://www.newsweek.com/id/30181

There was confusion, but on this board, Stein was condemned for his movie, totally misplaced, and I was made to be confused and had to come through a firestorm over this myself.

In the final conclusion, after all the finger pointing NOBODY HAS GIVEN ANY EVIDENCE OF WHAT THE MOVIE ACTUALLY PORTRAYED ABOUT STERNBERG, YET THE MOVIE HAS BEEN SMEARED FOR THIS ISSUE.

If you haven't guessed, I make no apology for what I have said or the movie showed until someone gives me something to apologize about.

I will be waiting for that something. (crickets chirping)

JMHO

Paul
Copyright 1996-2018 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us