The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page  
Retirement Discussions / Retire Early Liberal Edition 

URL:
http://boards.fool.com/igotcuriousabouthowmuchpassengerweight26681449.aspx


Subject: Re: Poll: Paybypound passenger airline travel?  Date: 5/27/2008 3:06 AM  
Author: salaryguru  Number: 12599 of 59804  
I got curious about how much passenger weight really impacted airline costs and here's what I found: http://www.fxstreet.com/fundamental/analysisreports/jetfue... “. . .Historically, fuel expenses have ranged between 10 and 15 percent of U.S. passenger airline operating costs and currently run somewhere between 25 percent and 40 percent. . .” So if the cost of flying an aircraft were 100% determined by passenger + luggage weight, then 25% to 40% of the ticket price could be justified by passenger + luggage weight. But even the empty aircraft has weight, so this estimate needs to be reduced by the ratio of total passenger loaded aircraft weighttoempty aircraft work. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737 According to Wikipedia, for a Boeing 737, the ratio of total payload weight to empty aircraft weight is 49% to 60% depending on the specific model of 737. Assuming the worst case – that the entire difference between payload weight and empty weight is due to passengers and their luggage, the percentage of airline ticket cost that is related to passenger + luggage weight is about 12% to 24%. Note that airlines typically fly some freight that is not directly tied to passengers so the assumption above is definitely a worst case estimate. So how much difference in cost does various passenger weights have on a flight? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_weight average weight US man: 190 lbs average weight US woman: 155 lbs average weight: 172.5 lbs Weight impact difference on airline costs: 100 lb person + luggage – person is 42% under weight (compared to average)  minimum ~5% of cost 300 lb person + luggage – 73% over weight (compare – maximum ~18% of cost But none of this analysis increases airline revenue unless the average cost of tickets increase. So the question airlines have to answer is, "Does a ticket price increase that involves weights and measurements of every single passenger and their luggage seem more beneficial than a simple acrosstheboard increase in ticket cost?" A second, related question is, "Is the cost of enforcing a 5% to 18% cost difference implied by weight worth the cost of enforement:?" 

Copyright 19962014 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us 