The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page

Motley Fool Investment Wiki / Wiki Contributors Forum

URL:  http://boards.fool.com/as-this-builds-out-your-going-to-have-multiple-26784622.aspx

Subject:  Re: Thoughts on a board for every article? Date:  7/3/2008  10:04 AM
Author:  TMFBreakerOrion Number:  51 of 597

As this builds out your going to have multiple terms that are closely related which could cause a different type of confusion if you have a board for each. Consider "daybagger" and "spiffy-pop" for example; do you really want two separate discussion boards?

I lean towards a board per term/article but there will be some jumble that can occur. Can it be a default for one board per article but allow for a manual override to join certain terms into one board? (Probably not practical but thought it was worth asking.)

Perhaps daybagger and spiffy-pop should link to a single article/page and thus have a single discussion board?


Karl ~ strolling through
Copyright 1996-2014 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us