The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page

Investment Analysis Clubs / Macro Economic Trends and Risks


Subject:  Intellectual indolence of those who attack Spec Date:  7/28/2009  10:12 PM
Author:  MrArbitrage Number:  300916 of 503074

July 28, 2009

The intellectual indolence of those who attack speculators
by MrArbitrage

The big story this week: regulators considering setting limits on Wall Street speculators

Forget additional position limits. Ceding that kind of authority to elected imbeciles is probably just as bad if not worse than the actual disease. It is a slippery slope, like allowing these buffoons to determine salaries. I think I would prefer to see the leverage abated. I have heard compelling arguments on the “pro” side of changing margin requirements but not too many “cons”. I don’t think that controlling copious quantities of commodities which are essential to human sustenance -with 10 cents on the dollar- is some kind of inherent right derived from natural law.

As I wrote back on June 20th 2008 in my piece called “Speculation: Good for America but Manipulative Analysis = Crime against Humanity”(at ) – the problem is fallaciously being attributed to “speculators” by intellectually lazy people like Bill O’Reilly. The demonization of “speculators” in the generic sense is quite dangerous to our free markets. If the mere presence of speculators CAUSED the vexing bubble in oil that we recently experienced, how do you explain the MAJORITY of time throughout the 20th century when there was relative equilibrium in prices? We had speculators THEN. This begs the question -WHY- was there stability during most of those years despite the presence of speculators?

The key to this imbalance (according to me) is the presence of two extreme variables that were NOT the norm for most of the past century and a quarter:


It is not normal to have a powerful company like Goldman Sachs permeating every level of state and federal government. Historically we have seen powerful industries with deep pocketed lobbyists (which I’m personally ok with). However, this parasitic company not only has access to legislators and presidential appointees – they have actually BECOME the most powerful people in our government. One might say that we the people are the “host”. The Goldman conspiracy is an interesting topic but what does that have to do with anything? In my aforementioned piece from June 2008, I elucidated on how I believe that Goldman may bear a substantial amount of responsibility for the pain the world suffered last year and which may have been the proverbial straw that broke the camel's back.

What the simple minded media overlooks in their critique is that WHILE Goldman was apparently making a fortune trading oil last year, their ANALYSTS were ubiquitous throughout every form of media talking up the price of oil while their trading division reaped a fortune at the expense of their fellow countrymen. As people in some parts of the world suffered starvation and Americans went broke from gas prices and a bursting real estate bubble – Goldman analysts threw gasoline on the fire as they daily inveighed on the direction of oil. These “analysts” never proffered any due diligence with quantifiable numbers to support their suspiciously timed and arbitrary price targets for “$200 per barrel within a year”. The sophistication of their due diligence, at least that which proliferated the media was as prosaic as