The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page

Investing/Strategies / Armchair Economists


Subject:  Re: So, how about that Date:  9/9/2011  5:23 PM
Author:  Ryan68 Number:  1992 of 2006

Well, if I'm being "all attacky-boy" it's because I (mistakenly) thought you were calling me dishonest. Which, to me, would be a good reason to strongly defend oneself, but I apologize for not thinking naj is the dishonest one...;-)

Your numbers are wrong, btw (unless you have a link proving OMB wrong). Looking over Naj's numbers they do include the costs of war.

Because something is paid for by using a Supplemental Bill - bypassing the Budgetary process - doesn't mean it isn't counted in the numbers.
Copyright 1996-2018 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us