The Motley Fool Discussion Boards
Real-Money Stock Picks / Matt Argersinger and Paul Chi
|Subject: Re: UPL question/comment||Date: 1/3/2012 2:53 PM|
|Author: TMFBabo||Number: 6 of 17|
As of the end of 2010 (when the debt was racked up), management remarked that the debt issuances increased the weighted average cost of 5.6% and average maturity of 9 years. 5.6% is not a high rate for an oil and gas company of this size.
Ultra's degree of valuation depends almost entirely on the price of natural gas. I strongly believe $3 gas will not persist indefinitely. PV-10 is based on constant pricing, and $3 gas will not persist if it costs almost every company more than that to pull it out of the ground. At an all-in cost of $2.61 per mcfe in 2010, Ultra is one of the low-cost leaders in the industry. They're not just "another natural gas producer."
There are a few things that can happen:
- Fewer companies drilling for natural gas due to low returns projects. They're looking for oil or natural gas liquids instead. This will eventually lower supply.
- Many companies have been drilling just to preserve leaseholds, since it's often use-it-or-lose-it. If they stop, that lessens supply (eventually).
- In general, natural gas consumption isn't rising very quickly. However, if there is a new normal, more uses will be found (natural gas power plants, what have you) and demand will slowly catch up.
- More and more fueling stations are being built. I've seen plenty of city bus fleets that use natural gas, and this shift will continue if there's more infrastructure for it.
- There are some projects in the works to be able to export liquefied natural gas in the future. Gas is very low in the US, but the prices are much higher in the rest of the world.
Plenty of smart people are on both sides of the natural gas debate. I side with the bulls on this one. The commodity price is too low and I believe both supply and demand will eventually force the price up. It may take a while, and I admit it sure does look ugly right now. Then again, that's why the stock is beaten down (making me interested in it).
|Copyright 1996-2016 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us|