The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page

Investing/Strategies / Retirement Investing

URL:  http://boards.fool.com/1987-was-the-first-year-for-which-i-was-able-to-29796875.aspx

Subject:  Re: Secrets of the 0.2% Date:  1/23/2012  1:03 AM
Author:  katiewa Number:  69971 of 75340

1987 was the first year for which I was able to easily find contribution limits, so I ran my spreadsheet from 1987 to 2016 and assumed the individual started working at age 23. I also assumed that 2013-2016 limits would be 17K, 17.5K, 17.5K, and 18K, with a 6K catch-up limit. I used simple interest on contributions for previous years and merely added contributions for the current year (no interest calculated for current year) to get a running total. At the stated maximum contributions
* At 5% return, an individual would have $763,036
* At 6% return, an individual would have $883,071
* At 7% return, an individual would have $1,027,361

A professional couple with good salaries, only 1-2 kids, and no divorce or significant illnesses or layoffs could theoretically do pretty well. But for perspective, the absolute top salary paid in our school district (PhD or Master's+36 and 14 years of experience) is just shy of $58K/year (effectively 10 months). Starting salary is $30K. You can't max out your contributions on that kind of income.

Kathleen
Copyright 1996-2014 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us