|
The Motley Fool Discussion Boards
|
Previous Page | |
|
Investment Analysis Clubs / The BMW Method |
||
|
URL:
http://boards.fool.com/i-have-asked-similar-questions-in-the-past-as-30234652.aspx
|
||
| Subject: Re: Which BMW chart? | Date: 8/30/2012 4:37 PM | |
| Author: cyclelex | Number: 40687 of 41116 | |
|
I have asked similar questions in the past as Maniladad, and have not been quite satisfied with the answers. I think their might not be a clear answer, or they are different for every company. My question has always been: We like long histories of CAGR. 30+ if available, 14 as a minimum. Is there a way to account for changing from a high growth model to a slower growth more mature company? Take the first ten years and cut that off the chart? I bought MSFT back in 2000 at the worst possible time. It had a great avg and current cagr. All of sudden high growth was over and it was flatter prospects. They continue to make great profit, but from a shareholder perspective it's been dead money for 12 years. From Jan 2000 to today it is approx. 1.8% CAGR (That's Yahoo with Divs. included). If we were to evaluate MSFT today, when would we start the left edge of the chart? |
||
| Copyright 1996-2013 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us | ||