|
The Motley Fool Discussion Boards
|
Previous Page | |
|
Financial Planning / Insurance - Life, Car, Home,etc. |
||
|
URL:
http://boards.fool.com/to-my-mind-quotunnamed-childrenquot-is-a-very-30235170.aspx
|
||
| Subject: Re: "unnamed children" as beneficiary | Date: 8/30/2012 10:10 PM | |
| Author: NoIDAtAll | Number: 17649 of 17784 | |
|
To my mind, "unnamed children" is a VERY loose, overly broad, description, just begging for interpretation issues. There is some limiting wording that can, somewhat, better describe what the policyholder intended, like: Unnamed children born of the Insured. Unnamed children born of a particular marriage. Unnamed children, including legally adopted children... And my, personal, favorite - Unnamed children born to NoIDAtAll. ~ ~ |
||
| Copyright 1996-2013 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us | ||