The Motley Fool Discussion Boards
Religion & Culture / Christian Fools
|Subject: Re: Cardinal Carlo Martini||Date: 10/2/2012 10:20 PM|
|Author: bdhinton||Number: 183171 of 189617|
I was beginning to think that you felt there was *really* something *wrong* with raping little girls.
Seriously? Since someone else thinks the nature of morality is different you get to classify it as not *really* thinking it's *wrong*?
Doesn't it depend on what we mean by "real"? And "wrong"?
I mean objective, existing outside of the human mind. You and Frydaze don't believe that morality exists objectively.
If it's not objective is it real? You don't think so, so I'm not sure what your beef is.
Again, I wasn't saying she thinks it is ok for others to rape someone. I'm saying she has no objective basis for saying someone else's code is immoral.
|Copyright 1996-2013 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us|