|
The Motley Fool Discussion Boards
|
Previous Page | |
|
Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway |
||
|
URL:
http://boards.fool.com/so-if-one-were-to-look-at-your-data-what-would-30303670.aspx
|
||
| Subject: Re: Influence on ROE in Investing returns | Date: 10/6/2012 7:23 AM | |
| Author: mungofitch | Number: 194698 of 201956 | |
|
So if one were to look at your data, what would the value of X be? Perhaps the value that eliminates the bottom 10% by ROE? Do you know what this value was on average in your test? Looks like it's generally the negative numbers, which are more common that I suspected. Fraction of population of 1700 Value Line stocks by ROE since Jan 1997. 10.2% negative To recap the returns Negative ROE = 6.11%/year Zero or unknown ROE = 10.56%/year Lower half of positive ROE = 11.52%/year Top half of positive ROE = 12.77%/year Bad negative numbers aren't worse than small negative numbers. The lowest returns are simply the subset "<0". If you wanted the highest return 30 stock portfolio given only the ROE field you'd choose the 30 stocks with ROE closest to 32%, which gives 15.6%/year before trading costs, perhaps a bit of a lucky outlier. I guess there are a few absurdly high ROE values that are a bad omen? A monthly-constituted portfolio of all stocks 35% ROE or better returned 12.6%. Jim |
||
| Copyright 1996-2013 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us | ||