The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page

Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway

URL:  http://boards.fool.com/jim-means-negative-cost-of-float-ie-30310080.aspx

Subject:  Re: Two Column/Rationalwalk Date:  10/9/2012  11:10 PM
Author:  DrtThrwingMonkey Number:  194788 of 211752

Jim means negative cost of float, i.e. underwriting profits.

My estimate last year was $1.3 bn, which was $20 bn in the preceding 9 years (even with Katrina and Rita) but -$7 bn 10 years before, i.e. 2001. One year later, the last 10 years are looking good, but to be conservative we should probably keep that bad year in the mix.

Even so, $1.5 bn pre-tax I think is a closer to the truth than zero (Buffett's implicit number). It's good to be conservative, but for an insurer with consistently profitable underwriting to leave that out is overdoing it, in my opinion.

Regards, DTM
Copyright 1996-2014 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us