The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page

Religion & Culture / Christian Fools


Subject:  Re: He Lost 95% of His "Friends" Date:  10/17/2012  4:00 PM
Author:  0x6a74 Number:  183704 of 198995

In short, you're trying to say that my marriage - performed by a government official with both participants not considering anything about God - shouldn't be called marriage. It is some lesser thing. To denote its lesser status, you wish to call it a 'civil union' instead.

If you don't want to share the word 'marriage' such that it encompasses both your religious understanding and my secular understanding, you can re-label your religious understanding as 'religious unions' (or whatever.) You don't get to re-label mine just because you don't want to share anymore.

it is interesting that the religious don't worry about all sorts of non-religious marriage being called 'marriage'..
just some complaining about some
Copyright 1996-2018 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us