The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page

Politics & Current Events / Political Asylum

URL:  http://boards.fool.com/ok-but-when-were-talking-about-merely-sexual-30430365.aspx

Subject:  Re: Scalia the Sophist Date:  12/13/2012  1:44 PM
Author:  WallyLock Number:  1844708 of 1971521

OK. But when we're talking about merely sexual identity we're past, or IMO should be, a concept of a "desirable" genetic disposition.

But why the "merely"? What is it about sexual identity that puts in the the class of things that we should not impose our morals on through legislation? I agree that we shouldn't, but what is the reason, and what other behaviors are going to fall under that reason?

Wally
Copyright 1996-2014 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us