The Motley Fool Discussion Boards
Retirement Discussions / Retire Early Liberal Edition
|Subject: Re: Connecticut||Date: 12/14/2012 6:46 PM|
|Author: telegraph||Number: 46791 of 99814|
"I guess we are all soldiers (even children) in the fight to maintain unrestricted access to firearms."
Same for drunk driving. How well did that work out for prohibition?
What is it, 40,000 to 50000 slaughtered on the roads each year, half of them by drunk drivers?
Lots of innocent kids, too...wiped out by 7th conviction DUI types who intercst and the libs will never put in jail, nor remove their driving licenses other than for a slap on the wrist and a promise to get 'treatment'.....
How about it intercst? First conviction drunk driving - six months suspension and car impounded......second conviction - driving priveleges taken away for life, not allowed to own or possess a car, and a year in jail.
Let's solve the drunk driving problem. The average kid on the street or growing up is a lot more likely to be killed by a DUI driver - and now a pot head high on weed in CO and WA and who knows what other states. Same thing. First conviction six months in jail. Second conviction you don't ever drive again or own a car. Simple.
|Copyright 1996-2017 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us|