The Motley Fool Discussion Boards
Personal Finances / Credit Cards and Consumer Debt
|Subject: Re: Settlement||Date: 1/8/2013 1:02 PM|
|Author: cabinsmama||Number: 306659 of 307563|
I presume they wouldn't move to a smaller house if you weren't there, so charging you for the physical space doesn't make sense to me.
Sometimes it's not about the *cost* as much as it's about the *worth*. It might not cost anything to have someone live with you, beyond a few bucks in increased utilities, but the worth is determined by the parties involved.
A spare bedroom in my house, with food for one, might cost $200.
It would take much, much more than that for me to let someone move in that room. The privacy would be worth a lot more than the cost of $200.
|Copyright 1996-2013 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us|