The Motley Fool Discussion Boards
Financial Planning / Tax Strategies
|Subject: Re: Why Not Take Gains in UTMA?||Date: 2/8/2013 12:20 AM|
|Author: MurrayS||Number: 117682 of 125861|
You're confusing two things: filing requirement (which implies having to pay tax) and the threshold for "kiddie" tax rates. For 2012 if a dependent has nothing but unearned income the standard deduction is $950. Beyond that tax is due.
According to TurboTax for 2012, you are mistaken.
When I made a fake return for my daughter using the actual gains from her account, I entered a hypothetical fund sale that adjusted her unearned income just below & above $1900.
Below $1900, her tax was calculated using the "Qualified Dividends and Capital Gain Tax Worksheet" which resulted in no taxes.
Above $1900, her tax was calculated using Form 8615 which I linked in my earlier post which clearly subtracts $1900 from unearned income with instructions to stop if zero.
So, if I can deduce the rules, above $1900 of unearned income, her income would be taxed according to form 8615 which I believe is at my tax rate.
Below $1900, her income would be taxed as qualified dividends and long term gains which, since 2007, is 0% for those in the 10% & 15% brackets.
If you don't mind, could you point out where I'm wrong?
|Copyright 1996-2017 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us|