The Motley Fool Discussion Boards
Financial Planning / Tax Strategies
|Subject: Re: Why Not Take Gains in UTMA?||Date: 2/8/2013 1:30 AM|
|Author: TMFPMarti||Number: 117683 of 120414|
You're confusing two things: filing requirement (which implies having to pay tax) and the threshold for "kiddie" tax rates. For 2012 if a dependent has nothing but unearned income the standard deduction is $950. Beyond that tax is due.
According to TurboTax for 2012, you are mistaken.
When I made a fake return for my daughter using the actual gains from her account, I entered a hypothetical fund sale that adjusted her unearned income just below & above $1900.
My dummy return was interest income, which is not subject to the special rate of zero, so that explains why I show tax and you don't. Sorry for the confusion. So, to sum up:
1. If a dependent has only unearned income the standard deduction for 2012 is $950. Above that amount the dependent must file a return.*
2. At $1900 of unearned income the kiddie tax rules kick in, and the dependent pays at the parent's rate.
3. If the dependent has only long-term cap gains and qualified dividends the dependent will pay zero tax up to $1900 of income even though a return may be required.
4. *In some cases the parent can report the child's income on the parent's return, but I've never been able to figure out why a parent would want to, and it cannot be done if Schedule D is involved.
Rule Your Retirement Home Fool
|Copyright 1996-2014 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us|