The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page 
Miscellaneous / Climate Change 

URL:
http://boards.fool.com/predictionvariability30536147.aspx


Subject: Prediction variability  Date: 2/11/2013 11:28 AM 
Author: LorenCobb  Number: 40818 of 64454 
Weather and climate prediction methods have at least three sources of variation: natural (intrinsic) variability, measurement error, and something often called "model error"  the errors that come from using incorrect parameters or even the wrong model. Needless to say, the statisticians who work with weather and climate scientists focus obsessively on all three. The following abstract of an upcoming talk at NCAR (National Center for Atmospheric Research, in Boulder) shows pretty well the state of current thinking on this complex problem. STATISTICAL POSTPROCESSING OF TEMPERATURE FORECASTS: THE IMPORTANCE OF SPATIAL MODELING Michael Scheuerer University of Heidelberg Tuesday, February 12, 2013 Mesa Lab VizLab 12:00 PM Abstract In order to represent forecast uncertainty in numerical weather prediction, ensemble prediction systems generate several different forecasts of the same weather variable by perturbing initial conditions and model parameters. The resulting ensemble of forecasts is interpreted as a sample of a predictive distribution. It offers valuable probabilistic information, but often turns out to be uncalibrated, i.e. it suffers from biases and typically underestimates the prediction uncertainty. Methods for statistical postprocessing have therefore been proposed to recalibrate the ensemble and turn it into a full predictive probability distribution. Weather variables like temperature depend on factors that are quite variable in space which suggests that postprocessing should be done at each site individually. If a predictive distribution is desired at locations where no measurements for calibration are available, postprocessing parameters from neighboring stations must be interpolated. We propose an extension of the nonhomogeneous Gaussian regression (NGR) approach for temperature postprocessing that uses an intrinsically stationary Gaussian random field model for spatial interpolation. This model is able to capture large scale fluctuations of temperature, while additional covariates are integrated into the random field model to account for altituderelated and other local effects. In the second part of this talk we discuss the modeling of spatial correlations of forecast errors for temperature. This becomes important whenever probabilistic forecasts at different sites are considered simultaneously, or when the interest is in composite quantities like averages, minima, or maxima of temperatu 