The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page

Religion & Culture / Atheist Fools


Subject:  Re: child pornography? Date:  3/26/2013  4:39 PM
Author:  dlbuffy Number:  419772 of 507042

LOL...a topic no one will touch. (<-- yes that was awful)

It is my understanding that natural pics, ie - nudism, are not deemed offensive. It is when the tone or the actions are exploitative that it becomes offensive.

So if you have family pics of the 3yr old running naked in the backyard, playing in mud....not pron.

However, we now have states trying to outlaw nipslips and other 'natural' body features because they are icky. So this will probably change to make our society even more wacky and messed up about our bodies and our sexuallity than ever.
Copyright 1996-2018 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us