The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page

Religion & Culture / Atheist Fools


Subject:  Re: child pornography? Date:  3/26/2013  9:43 PM
Author:  CountNoCount Number:  419799 of 507872

dib: It is my understanding that natural pics, ie - nudism, are not deemed offensive. It is when the tone or the actions are exploitative that it becomes offensive.

So if you have family pics of the 3yr old running naked in the backyard, playing in mud....not pron.

We have a pic of my wife at (circa) two, standing in the hall, naked as the day she was born. Cute as anything.

Copyright 1996-2018 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us