The Motley Fool Discussion Boards
Investing/Strategies / Retirement Investing
|Subject: Re: Strategy comparison S&P500 vs. IUL [rev 1]||Date: 4/4/2013 1:46 AM|
|Author: CCinOC||Number: 71690 of 82312|
I don't know if you're missing anything, Dave, but the parameters, what-ifs, definitions and machinations have gotten so complicated as to render a comparison (S&P500 vs. IUL) moot.
The practical reality is that an IUL...
~ Protects your principal from ALL market declines. (Zero is your hero.)
~ Pays a death benefit, in the event of your demise, to heirs in many multiples of your total contribution.
~ Charges fees far lower (.75-1.20%) than mutual funds, 401(k) and IRA (3-4%).
~ Offers certain policies with an unlimited upside (no caps); i.e. Allianz's proprietary blended index.
~ Ensures that ALL gains are protected.
~ Provides an "annual reset" to ensure that your account participates in periods of robust market appreciation.
~ Distributions are tax free.
~ In some states, IULs feature ABR (accelerated benefits rider) in the event of chronic, critical or terminal illness. (Not available in CA.)
Compare the above against trading naked in the S&P500. No contest, in my opinion, albeit we don't seem to be able to arrive at a simple comparison of percentage gains via back testing.
|Copyright 1996-2017 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us|