The Motley Fool Discussion Boards
Politics & Current Events / Conservative Fools
|Subject: Re: Steyn: Coexistence||Date: 4/22/2013 3:00 AM|
|Author: Umm||Number: 117873 of 143977|
"That, quite simply, is a lie, a typical bit of pandering to the right-wing ignorati who lap this stuff up."
If there are any real pro-choice reporters who have intentionally shied away from covering the story because they think it will reflect badly on abortion then they are doing the pro-choice movement a disservice with their ignorance.
The trial isn't about abortion. Gosnell isn't on trial for doing abortions. He is on trial for malpractice and murder. Anyone who thinks that the gruesome horrors that went on inside Gosenell's clinic are what goes on in a typical abortion clinic doesn't have the first clue about what goes on in a typical abortion clinic.
I assume that most who are crying about the perceived lack of coverage are just ignorant of the distinction I pointed out above, but I also think there are a few who do understand this distinction but choose to ignore it in order to smear the pro-choice movement with the actions of Gosnell.
As for the media not giving it attention over and over people don't realize what a terrible story it is for that type of coverage. Viewers don't want to hear 24/7 news coverage of babies of poor urban mothers getting killed over and over again when there are no new details to be reported (and no real expectation of new details to emerge). Any report about the story today is going to contain the same details of the story as written last week.
For a person to think that this is intentionally being covered up a person would have to be clueless that most news is ratings driven. Or think that a reporter would go "Hmm, we could increase our ratings by doing a story on this, but let's bury it instead since it supposedly shows abortion in a bad light."
Turn it around. If "the left wing media" is intentionally not