The Motley Fool Discussion Boards

Previous Page

Investing/Strategies / Retirement Investing


Subject:  Re: Hi gang... wow!!! Date:  9/19/2013  12:13 PM
Author:  aj485 Number:  73086 of 88823

Mitigate, but not eliminate. Which is Dave's point.

But Dave's plan introduces other risks that he can't eliminate, either, like the risk of the insurance company unilaterally changing terms or the risk of the insurance company becoming insolvent. And he doesn't even really try to mitigate those risks.

If he's allowed to ignore risks without even attempting to mitigage, then why can't mitigated risks be ignored?

Copyright 1996-2018 trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us