The Motley Fool Discussion Boards
Retirement Discussions / Retire Early CampFIRE
|Subject: Re: FOX "News" Knows Wazzup||Date: 11/1/2013 10:42 PM|
|Author: 1HappyFool||Number: 703667 of 795012|
<<Why did you fail to answer my questions?>>
<<Are you not committed to intellectually honest discussion?>>
<<If it's a good idea at the federal level, why wouldn't it be a good idea at the state level?>>
I never argued that it should be only a federal level. I merely questioned why it should be done at the state level but not at Federal level.
I said nothing about "only at the federal level", so that's not a relevant answer to my question. Answering a question I didn't ask instead of the question I asked is not honest. Perhaps I over estimated your brilliance. I'll dumb it down for you.
Do you believe it would be a good idea at the federal level?
If so, why wouldn't it be a good idea at the state level instead?
Already Mitt Romney had done this at the state level.
Do you believe that what Mitt Romney did as a Governor has any relevance to whether it would be a good or bad idea to do something at the federal level?
<<Is it because such systems would be too easy to circumvent by liberty-conscious citizens?>>
This is a straw-men you are creating and arguing.
That is not a relevant answer to the question I asked. I'll dumb it down again.
Would you be opposed to implementing a single payer system at the state level only on the basis that it would be too easy to circumvent by liberty-conscious citizens?
You raised at federal level it injures your liberties. How?
I told you that it violates our right to freedom of association. Do you believe you have a right to choose whether or not to associate with others (assuming you are not forcing your association on them)?
instead of suppor