Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 2
Ah That's too bad. Well that's understandable.

Of the four options presented I would "anything but number 3!" :)

I agree with Kathie that having a distinctive name/brand will help draw people in so I propose we hold another name brainstorming session thread.

If nothing comes up universally agreed upon better than Flossary than you can always go back to that

Option 4 is actually kind of appealing in a way.

If certain terms in regular fool articles could be linked to the Wiki definitions (and it should probbaly be denoted prominently that they are wiki definitions just so fool legal doesn't get all upset if say some day by accident some entry is horribly wrong). I would think that would draw tremendous amount of people to the wiki then.

I really like how interlinked Investopedia's articles with their definitions.

So in short I'm saying- first decide if you want the wiki to be named (and separate from the fool itself) then if you do try option 1 and if that fails got to option 2.

I can see arguments for and against wholesale integration.
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement