Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0

Interesting point and in general, I agree with it. However, I'm interested in your opinion of using the tax code as a behavioral incentive, specifically in reference to your point that the loss of efficiency and tax neutrality is a deadweight loss to the overall economy.

An example would be the "sin" taxes on alcohol and tobacco. Certainly these taxes affect the equilibrium supply and demand price point and remove some efficiency from those markets. However, isn't society better off for that lack of efficiency?

I see two possible cases where this is beneficial. One is where we lose efficiency in a particular market but gain economic utility as a whole. The other is where non-neutrality provides a non-economic utility or perhaps a meta-efficiency that benefits society.
Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.