Howdy fools - This question is motivated by a column in the January, 2005 issue of Money magazine.In the "Intelligent Investor" column (I think that's the one), Jason Zweig advocates favoring bonds over stocks in your 401(k) if you have investments in both a 401(k) and a traditional, taxable brokerage. The rationale is that interest income from bonds is taxable at up to 35%, depending on your tax bracket, while the maximum tax rate for capital gains is 15%.By my reckoning, though, he's failing to factor in the fact that taxes are paid on the initial capital to be invested. For example, assume that you have $1000 to invest, you're in the 35% tax bracket (both now and when you retire, for simplicity), you have 20 years until retirement, and your rate of return on the investment is 5% (i.e. you'll make the same investment either in your 401(k) or outside of it, the only question is where). My math looks something like this:For the 401(k):Available Investment $1000.00Value at end $2653.30Less income tax $928.65Post-tax income $1724.64For the non tax-advantaged account:Available Investment $1000.00Less income tax $350.00Initial Contribution $650.00Value at end $1724.64Less initial contrib. (already taxed) $650.00Amount to be taxed $1074.64Less cap gains tax $161.20Cap gains retained $913.44Plus initial principal $650.00Post-tax income $1563.45This analysis leads one to precisely the opposite conclusion advocated in the article.So, my question is .... what am I missing?
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. M