Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0

As I understand the situation, your employer had accumulated $X in an account for you. This was not shares of stock, but plain old cash. Upon your separation the employer turned that $X into Y shares of stock. The gross $X was included in your income, so that's what you paid for the stock, regardless of what it's trading for on the day they issue it to you.

Actually, my employer had accumulated stock in that account (OK, stock "units", but there was no cash component). This employer match was by rule 100% in company stock, ala Enron. Does this make a difference to the argument?

Sorry to beat this issue to death but I would truly like to understand the situation, and the retirement plan "specialists" I spoke to are singularly unhelpful.

T.J.



Print the post  

Announcements

Disclaimer:
In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement