Biased uninformed opinion thatYeah - except that I spoke specifically about Climate Science...and the source of that statistic isn't me--- I should have said 93% though... to be precise. Rounding isn't really needed. http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science_and_impacts/glo...I repeat - it isn't a valid source of news. It is a nice way for you to entertain yourself DD, but it isn't accurate about this topic and I have to doubt that it is a lot better on any other. One might expect Fox to be more accurate with respect to government corruption and the fraud being perpetrated by Wall Street, but I don't really need them to tell me what I already know about those things. You may have noticed that I agree with you a lot more often in those areas than on climate science. It may be that science is a weak spot for Fox and the rest isn't all that bad. I don't have stats on "the rest". I am not upset about you posting them. They remind me of one of the clearest reasons I left the USA. "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be." -- Thomas Jefferson The illusion of freedom provided to you by your puppetmasters is what you get from Fox. I suggest that you need to look harder at who is actually being deceived. It might be better for you to be more suspicious of your sources.
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Ra