Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: esxokm Big red star, 1000 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 49649  
Subject: Bonuses on "Frozen" Date: 4/26/2014 12:53 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 2
Here is an interesting item on Disney not paying bonus monies to animators who worked on "Frozen" who were laid off before they had an opportunity to get the bonus. In contrast, workers at the studio who did not participate in production activities on the film received a bonus. Thus, there is an argument as to the inequity of the situation.

http://www.deadline.com/2014/04/frozen-animators-no-bonus-di...

Here's my take.

It's difficult to form a proper opinion on this because I do not know how much animators make. I am going to assume, however, that it must be decent money, especially considering that it is a dream job that talent does for the love of it. Yes, obviously people need to be paid, and paid well, for this line of work; still, this work is a lot different from other forms of labor, especially manual labor.

Disney, in my opinion, should strive to keep as much money as possible in its coffers. Therefore, I think bonus monies should be generally eliminated from compensation structures (that goes especially toward management). There really is no need to give animators a bonus; they will work just as hard on any project. It's just as ludicrous to give voice talent on an animation film millions in bonus dollars just because a cartoon turned out to be a hit (see "Shrek").

If Disney wants to pay animators more money, it should do it. Just don't go on the theory that a bonus will ensure a hit. That's like saying options provide incentive for employees; I'd argue they do not.

All of that being said, it was discriminatory of Disney to do what it did. I would have paid the laid-off individuals a bonus. This is another reason why bonuses should not be paid: ambiguity of fairness.

The best line from the piece, which almost seems to argue my point, comes at the end. A Disney exec said the bonus "was because of 'Frozen' but not about 'Frozen'." I believe that. I also believe that it puts into question the management, and more importantly, the maximization, of profits. Hit films like this don't come around all the time; once a phenomenon asserts itself in the marketplace, it should be exploited on an excessive basis on behalf of shareholders.
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

Pencils of Promise - Back to School Drive
"Pencils of Promise works with communities across the globe to build schools and create programs that provide education opportunities for children."
Managing Your Wealth
Our own TMFHockeypop from Rule Your Retirement fame on the TV show Managing Your Wealth.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Post of the Day:
Macro Economics

Smuggling Rice and Garlic
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement