Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Prev | Next | Next Thread
Author: tc001 Three stars, 500 posts Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 121564  
Subject: Re: Roth and Traditional Ira Date: 9/19/1998 9:27 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 0
Bryan wrote:
>>.... I also like the idea of having 2 different types of Ira's (roth and traditional) so that if the Congress changes the Ira laws in the future one Ira might be better than the other and thus by having both types I am covering my behind in a sense.<<

TMFTaxes replied:
>>As has been pointed out here in the past, many times there are very compelling reasons to convert to a Roth and pay the tax today. But I just believe that way too many people are jumping in without seeing if there is any water in the pool.<<

Roy's point about having compelling reasons to convert (IMO) hits most directly at the Roth advantage in estate planning. My arguement all along has been that most people are pretty sure of what kind of estate they'll leave behind, and for most people it's only wishful thinking that they'll amass a small fortune for their heirs through an IRA, which kills the best reason for the Roth conversion. (I can cover this in another post if you have doubts about why we all won't become rich just because of IRAs.)

So if estate planning isn't your reason for converting, then the "less compelling" reasons come up. The biggest of these is, of course, getting tax-free money in retirement. On Jan. 31, I posted a very lengthy analysis that dampens the widely proclaimed Roth "tax-free" advantage. In short, every analysis I saw at the beginning of the year (when the topic was very hot) failed to recognize that even if you end up with a million dollars or more in your IRA, that alone won't necessarily cost you more in taxes paid with a traditional IRA than what you might save through a Roth. Most calculations ignored some very basic assumptions, which made the Roth look invincible, and I've been whining about it since December. (Thanks for getting me started again, Bryan!)

I agree that the diversification idea (as I have also said before) is appealing. If you can't predict future tax laws, CYA! But the best way for most people to achieve that diversification is to leave traditional IRAs alone and simply put all future contributions into a Roth.
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Prev | Next | Next Thread

Announcements

Disclaimer:
In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
Pencils of Promise - Back to School Drive
"Pencils of Promise works with communities across the globe to build schools and create programs that provide education opportunities for children."
Post of the Day:
Macro Economics

Russia Collapsing Again?
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement