No. of Recommendations: 0
But it takes a minimum of 20% as revenue--and therein lies your problem. Thus, you are a part of the problem. You are not proposing a viable solution and you know this to be a fact

But the historical average is about 18.3% for revenues and 20% for spending, so I don't understand why you think that poster is part of the problem and knows that is not a fact.

A lot of people think it is ok to run a small deficit, I think even Buffett. 2% (20% - 18%) is acceptable to many.

All the democrats keep saying how great the Clinton economy was and we should just let the upper brackets go back to those good ole days. Guess what, ALL the rates were higher, that is why it worked. And the spending was lower. Obama does not want ALL the rates higher. You can't move 15% rev to 18% or 20% on the backs of the 2%. Yes they should pay more, but it is not possible to fix the problem just by taking more money from them.

I also did not see you mention what spending cuts you thought would be acceptable to drop spending by at least 2% of GDP to inch back towards historical normals. Please enlighten us.
Print the post  


What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.