But thanks for proving my point: he was there to score emotional points and shame the pro-gun side into capitulating to his argument. That's an exceedingly cheap and dishonest tactic, and shame on whatever jerk it was that put this poor guy up to it.He's there to put a human face on the cost of the 2nd amendment. His child became the collateral damage of the right to bear arms.That it makes you uncomfortable to be faced with the bloody carnage that is the direct result of your political position doesn't mean it's "cheap and dishonest" (how could it possibly be dishonest??) to do so.In fact, it's necessary.
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar