But, that is balanced by the facts that they'll receive a smaller share of the inheritance and their parents probably had less for them when they were growing up; e.g. less money for college, etc.By that logic, no one generation ever gets any extra benefits or pays extra costs. The generation that paid higher costs, has a reduced burden from elderly parents and gets bigger inheritances. Generations that unerpay into the system, must support their parents and get smaller inheritances. Since it doesn't matter which generation bearrs the burden, then perhaps we split the cost equally. Lower benefits & higher taxes for the relatively short term until the last benefit is paid.Either way, it's bad policy to pit one generation against another. By absorbing the costs of transferring to individual retirement accounts now, we can eventually treat welfare as welfare, and social security as retirement savings.
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. M