UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: yodaorange Big red star, 1000 posts Feste Award Nominee! Feste Award Winner! Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 465354  
Subject: California bankruptcy 2nd inning update Date: 3/28/2013 2:04 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 32
We are coming to the end of the second inning in the ongoing California bankruptcies of Stockton and San Bernardino. I have posted before that the game will probably go on for many years and end up at the US Supreme Court.

Testimony finished today in an important part of the Stockton case. All of the bond insurers (Assured Guaranty Corp, Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp and National Public Finance Guarantee Corp) joined with a few mutual funds that hold Stockton bonds. The group is challenging whether Stockton is even eligible to file bankruptcy.

Part of the bankruptcy process is that the municipality must show they attempted to solve the financial issues but were unsuccessful. The insurers’ position is twofold:

1) Stockton did NOT negotiate with all parties in good faith. They take particular issue with the city pensions being kept whole while all other parties are being asked to take haircuts. Stockton did NOT attempt to lower the payments to Calpers that support the pensions. Stockton DID ask all of the bond holders to take haircuts both on the interest payments AND the principal amount. This is why the bond insurers are actively fighting Stockton.

2) Stockton did NOT fully explore reducing expenses and raising taxes. The insurers maintain that Stockton has the financial ability to balance the budget while paying the bondholders back in full.

Bankruptcy judge Christopher Klein heard three days of testimony and said he will rule by next Monday, April 1st. It appears he has a binary choice:

1) Approve Stockton’s entry into bankruptcy, in which case the insurers will appeal his ruling.

2) Deny Stockton’s entry into bankruptcy, in which case, the city will go back to the drawing board. It is not clear if the judge will rule about the relative standing of Calpers/pensions or not.

This case, in addition to the San Bernardino bankruptcy, is being closely watched. Stockton kept making its required payments to Calpers. San Bernardino did NOT make its required payments to Calpers. Calpers in turn, sued San Bernardino for non-payment.

BOTTON LIME: It is far from clear which side will ultimately prevail in the pensioners versus bondholders. Next Monday, we will get to see who is ahead at the end of the second inning.

Thanks,

Yodaorange
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

Foolanthropy 2014!
By working with young, first-time moms, Nurse-Family Partnership is able to truly change lives – for generations to come.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Post of the Day:
Macro Economics

Looking at Currency Ratios
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement